Will Antoine Griezmann make it to the 2026 World Cup with France? We analyze statistics, current events, and his role with Les Bleus on their way to the most important tournament on the planet.
Home
»
World Cup 2026
»
WHICH COUNTRIES WILL BID TO HOST THE 2030 WORLD CUP?
The 2030 World Cup will be no ordinary tournament: it will mark the centenary of the first edition, held in Uruguay in 1930. Therefore, the competition to host the tournament has not only a sporting dimension, but also symbolic, political, and emotional ones. Various bids have already been submitted or announced with great fanfare, some with a rich history, others with significant financial backing, and several with strategic alliances that promise to fight to the end to organize the most special World Cup of all. In this article, we'll tell you which countries have already thrown their hats in the ring, what their real chances are, what's behind each proposal, and why the 2030 World Cup is already being fought… off the pitch.
Official Bids So Far
FIFA has opened the selection process for the 2030 World Cup host country, and, as expected, several interesting coalitions have formed. Some seek to honor history, others are betting on world-class infrastructure, and still others aim to win through numbers and diversity. These are the bids that, so far, have been confirmed.
1. Spain, Portugal, and Morocco (with Ukraine pending)
This intercontinental alliance is presented as the favorite due to its organizational capacity, modern infrastructure, and the backing of UEFA and CAF. It initially included Ukraine as a gesture of solidarity, although its role is under review due to the war. Morocco joins as a bridge between Europe and Africa. It includes venues in three countries and two continents. Spain has World Cup experience (1982) and Morocco hosted the Club World Cup. It has strong political backing from UEFA. 2. Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay and Chile. Known as the “sentimental bid”, it seeks to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the World Cup by returning to where it all began: Montevideo. It proposes a celebration with South American flavor, unparalleled passion, and legendary stadiums like the Centenario. Uruguay won and hosted the first World Cup in 1930. Argentina is a football powerhouse with history and titles. It would be the first time four South American countries co-host. 3. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Greece (withdrawn) Although this bid generated buzz due to its economic potential and Saudi Arabia's strong entry into world football, it seems unlikely to come to fruition. The combination of culture, money, and geopolitics didn't entirely convince FIFA or the confederations. Arabia has already hosted major sporting events. Greece brought the European touch, Egypt the African link. Unofficial withdrawal, but no movement in 2025. For now, the clearest head-to-head is between the Ibero-African bid (Spain, Portugal, Morocco) and the Río de la Plata bid (Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and Paraguay). The final decision will be in 2026, but the campaign is already heating up.
Arguments of each bid
Each group seeking to host the 2030 World Cup is playing its cards with different strategies. Some appeal to emotion, others to logistics. Here we break down the strengths they are using to convince FIFA… and public opinion.
The power of history: Conmebol
South America's proposal has an emotional factor that is hard to match: its centennial. Opening matches are being considered in Montevideo and Buenos Aires as a direct tribute to the 1930 World Cup. Furthermore, South American passion doesn't need marketing: it's felt in the soul. Montevideo already has plans to renovate the Centenario Stadium. Argentina has experience as a host in 1978 and multiple Copa América tournaments. Paraguay and Chile would contribute new venues and geographical balance. The structure and logistics: UEFA + CAF. The bid from Spain, Portugal, and Morocco offers airports, high-speed trains, world-class stadiums, and enormous hotel capacity. They are appealing for the World Cup to be "easy to experience" for players, media, and fans.
More than 15 FIFA-class stadiums are already ready.
Spain and Portugal have hosted European Championships and finals.
Morocco would add cultural diversity and access to African players.
Both bids make sense, but they represent two different visions: history vs. efficiency. One is driven by passion, the other by reason. And FIFA will have to balance both sides.
What FIFA says and the timeline
FIFA has already established the official timeline for the process to choose the host of the 2030 World Cup. Although the decision will be made at its Congress in 2026, several key steps occur beforehand. Here's the timeline and some spicy statements.
2022-2023: Registration of candidacies.
2024: Technical evaluation and visits to the candidate countries.
2025: Official presentation of complete proposals.
2026 (same year as the World Cup in the USA): Final decision by vote of the member federations.
Gianni Infantino has said that “the 2030 World Cup must be an unprecedented global celebration.” This fuels rumors about a tournament with opening matches in South America and the final stages in Europe/Africa, which would be unprecedented… but logistically very complicated. It was also leaked that FIFA wants venues with a “post-World Cup legacy.” That is: stadiums that remain useful, not white elephants. This gives an advantage to countries with strong leagues or experience in mega-events. So beyond the excitement, there's a technical checklist that could tip the scales.
YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED
